vfc3 vs pc
yoyo
Posted 2010-06-13 11:06 AM (#62097)
Subject: vfc3 vs pc


Cruiser

Posts: 62
ESCALON CA.
power commander with auto tune is most expensive so it must be the best, right?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sonicbluerider
Posted 2010-06-13 11:39 AM (#62098 - in reply to #62097)
Subject: Re: vfc3 vs pc


Tourer

Posts: 576
, IA
no doubt there
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2010-06-13 1:26 PM (#62103 - in reply to #62097)
Subject: Re: vfc3 vs pc


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
Auto tuner removes the guess work and keeps on tuning as you ride. No couples hundred dollar dyno sessions. Plus if u add more performance add-ons it will just retune for that as well.!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Webhair
Posted 2010-06-14 3:05 PM (#62183 - in reply to #62097)
Subject: Re: vfc3 vs pc


Iron Butt

Posts: 669
Peachtree City, GA
Kevinx installed my cams Saturday with a PCV... Now to get the AutoTune in and set up - so, we will see in a few weeks...
I am lucky enough to have my wife's Vision with the same cams and VFCIII to compare the two set ups...

I like the theory behind that PCV with the AutoTune compare to the VFCIII - I think it comes done to how simple do you want it?
(If it is slower then I may just have to put it on my wife?s bike ? SSSHHHHH ? don?t tell her?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
kevinx
Posted 2010-06-14 5:47 PM (#62201 - in reply to #62097)
Subject: Re: vfc3 vs pc


Visionary

Posts: 1340
Gainesville Fl Home of the Gators
Simple is best in my book, and the VFC3 works beautifully in the Vision. Cost effective, easier to install, incredibly low failure rate, easy to live with
Top of the page Bottom of the page
yoyo
Posted 2010-06-15 6:21 PM (#62301 - in reply to #62097)
Subject: RE: vfc3 vs pc


Cruiser

Posts: 62
ESCALON CA.
GOT AN E-MAIL FROM LLOYD, HE SAID HE IS NOT GUNG HO ON AUTO TUNE, ANYONE HAD PROBLEMS?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Prostreet1
Posted 2010-06-15 6:44 PM (#62307 - in reply to #62201)
Subject: Re: vfc3 vs pc


Cruiser

Posts: 184
Allen Park, MI
kevinx - 2010-06-14 6:47 PM

Simple is best in my book, and the VFC3 works beautifully in the Vision. Cost effective, easier to install, incredibly low failure rate, easy to live with


Hard to argue that thinking??
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Webhair
Posted 2010-06-16 7:53 AM (#62352 - in reply to #62301)
Subject: RE: vfc3 vs pc


Iron Butt

Posts: 669
Peachtree City, GA
yoyo - 2010-06-15 7:21 PM

GOT AN E-MAIL FROM LLOYD, HE SAID HE IS NOT GUNG HO ON AUTO TUNE, ANYONE HAD PROBLEMS?


Not that I have heard of. I would be interested in his reasons.

Other then a pain to install...

I will let you know in a few months. I am planning on installing the AutoTune AT-100 this weekend and then running it for a a few months to adjust. Once that is complete I plan on taking to a PowerCommander Dyno to have it checked out - just to see how close it does get it...

With the AT-100 you are suppose to be able to build the fuel tables for each cylinder. Not jsut a common table that is "close" for both.

Now keep in mind we are just talking about the fuel tables, not the ignition timing table. That would have to be done on a dyno.

Of course this is all in theory...



Edited by Webhair 2010-06-16 8:14 AM
Top of the page Bottom of the page